Risk Management in Software Security: Principles, Context, and Practical Prioritization
Software security and risk management involves identifying, assessing, and mitigating security threats to applications, data, and infrastructure with a particular focus on vulnerabilities, threat modeling, and the evolving landscape of cyberattacks.
Published May 21, 2025.
Security teams implement a wide variety of code scanners to manage software security risk, but these scanners generate thousands of findings, making it unrealistic to patch every potential vulnerability. This is where risk management steps in.
This article discusses the fundamental principles of identifying, assessing, and treating security risks within the software development lifecycle. We'll explore the crucial context that shapes these risks and, most importantly, provide practical guidance on how to prioritize your security efforts for maximum impact.
» Skip to the solution: Learn how Jit's AI Agents can mitigate software security risk more efficiently
What Is Risk Management in Modern Software Security?
Software security and risk management is the process of evaluating potential security risks to applications, data, and infrastructure in alignment with business priorities, compliance requirements, and the specific architecture of applications.
This involves identifying, assessing, and mitigating vulnerabilities and understanding the evolving landscape of cyberattacks to make informed decisions about risk mitigation.
Key features to consider include:
| Software Risk Factors | Required Controls | Risk Management Process |
|---|---|---|
| Dependency Risk | Software Composition Analysis (SCA) | Inventory and continuous monitoring of dependencies |
| API Risk | API security testing, rate limiting, & authentication | Secure API design and implementation & ongoing testing |
| Hardcoded Secrets | Secrets detection tools & secure secret management | Automated scanning, secure storage and access controls |
| Runtime Vulnerabilities | Dynamic application security testing (DAST) & web application firewalls (WAF) | Continuous monitoring & runtime protection mechanisms |
| Infrastructure as Code (IaC) | IaC security scanning | Secure configuration management & version control |
Factors That Contribute to Growing AppSec Vulnerabilities
In the modern world, development teams focus on speed (CI/CD), which often means neglecting security in favor of using cloud-native architectures and API-driven ecosystems that increase the attack surface. This can result in unpatched flaws and misconfigurations stemming from:
- Releasing software too fast before it is adequately tested and verified.
- Relying on third-parties for software without sufficient vetting.
- Rapidly evolving ways attackers are getting into systems, exacerbated by the efficiency of artificial intelligence (AI).
- Not integrating security into the development processes.
- Forgoing a step-by-step plan, potentially resulting in overwhelming notifications, slower remediation efforts, and increased risk of exposure.
» Learn more about API security
These factors show that a new kind of risk management is needed that focuses on threats based on how easy they are to exploit and their impact, integrating security early (shift-left), automating scanning for vulnerabilities, and enforcing secure coding standards.
» Think beyond shift-left security: How to rethink AppSec strategies in the age of AI
A Simpler Way to Shift-Left Security
Jit helps you integrate security into your development pipeline to catch vulnerabilities before they hurt you.
5 Core Principles of Risk Management Applied to AppSec
1. Risk Identification
This is the initial stage where you actively seek out and identify potential security risks that could impact your applications, the data they handle, and the systems they interact with.
To spot risks, you should look at how easy it is to take advantage of a vulnerability, how much of a threat it poses, and how relevant it is to the system through threat modeling, classifying assets, and analyzing attack surfaces.
In AppSec, this involves identifying:
- Vulnerabilities: Weaknesses in the application's design, implementation, or configuration (SQL injection, cross-site scripting, insecure authentication, etc.).
- Threats: Potential actors or events that could exploit these vulnerabilities (malicious hackers, insider threats, automated botnets, etc.).
- Assets: The valuable components that need protection (user data, sensitive business logic, API endpoints, infrastructure, etc.).
- Impacts: The potential negative consequences if a threat exploits a vulnerability against an asset (data breach, financial loss, reputational damage, service disruption, etc.).
Key risk identification tools include:
- SAST: Static application security testing can identify insecure code patterns early on, but it should be set up to only highlight issues that could be exploited.
- SCA: Software composition analysis scans third parties, but it must consider if they can be exploited and if patches are available.
- DAST: Dynamic application security testing evaluates applications and prioritizes findings based on how an attack could occur in the real world instead of just theoretical weaknesses.
» Learn more: SAST vs. DAST and our AppSec guide to SCA
2. Risk Assessment
Once risks are identified, this stage involves analyzing and evaluating them to understand their potential severity and likelihood of occurrence. The goal is to determine the level of risk associated with each identified threat-vulnerability-asset-impact combination.
True risk assessment balances vulnerability severity and its impact on the real world, requiring an in-depth understanding of the application architecture. It involves evaluating security findings based on how easily they could be exploited, the importance of the assets involved, and the potential damage.
In AppSec, this assesses:
- Likelihood: How probable is it that the identified threat will exploit the vulnerability? Factors include the attacker's capability, the accessibility of the vulnerability within the context of the application's design, and the prevalence of attacks targeting similar weaknesses.
- Impact: What would be the business, operational, or legal consequences if the vulnerability were successfully exploited? This considers the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of affected assets given their role and interconnectedness within the application architecture.
3. Risk Prioritization
With a clear understanding of the assessed risks, this stage involves ranking them based on their significance, allowing you to focus your limited resources (time, budget, personnel) on addressing the most critical risks first.
Risk prioritization often involves assigning qualitative (high, medium, low) or quantitative (a numerical score based on likelihood and impact) values to each risk. Frameworks like CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) can help standardize the assessment of vulnerability severity.
Engineers should prioritize vulnerabilities based on ease to exploit, impact, and business context. Key factors include:
- Active exploits: Was the exploit discovered and assigned a CVE (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures) score? A vulnerability with an active exploit and a CVE should typically be considered a high or critical priority for remediation. The window of opportunity for attackers is open, and the potential for immediate damage is significant.
- Ease of exploitation: This factor assesses how difficult it is for an attacker to successfully exploit the vulnerability. Do they require advanced skills, authentication, or user interaction? Vulnerabilities that are easy to exploit require less skill and fewer resources from attackers, making them more likely to be targeted by a wider range of threat actors—including less sophisticated ones.
- Data sensitivity: This factor evaluates the type and sensitivity of the data that could be compromised if the vulnerability is successfully exploited. Could exploitation expose PII (personally identifiable information), financial data, or intellectual property?
- System criticality: This factor assesses the importance of the affected system or application to the organization's core business operations. The potential for operational disruption and business-wide impact necessitates immediate remediation to ensure business continuity and minimize downtime.
- Internet-facing: Is the vulnerable component or application directly accessible from the public internet? Internet-facing vulnerabilities significantly increase the attack surface and the likelihood of exploitation, often requiring a higher priority for remediation.
- Compensating controls: Are there existing security controls in place that could prevent or significantly hinder the exploitation of the vulnerability? For example, a properly configured Web Application Firewall (WAF) might mitigate the risk of certain web-based vulnerabilities. The presence of effective compensating controls can influence the immediate priority of remediation.
Rather than relying solely on CVSS scores, teams should incorporate threat intelligence, runtime insights, and compensating controls to prioritize real-world risks over theoretical vulnerabilities.
Automatic Vulnerability Prioritization
Jit's AI Agents consider all the factors of risk prioritization from active exploits to compensating controls to automate the process at scale.
Learn More4. Risk Treatment
This stage involves deciding on and implementing actions to manage the identified and prioritized risks. The goal is to reduce the likelihood and/or impact of the risks to an acceptable level.
In AppSec, key factors and risk treatment options include:
- Remediation: Eliminating the risk altogether by removing a vulnerable feature or choosing a different technology.
- Mitigation: When immediate remediation isn't possible, compensating controls (WAF rules, monitoring, etc.) can reduce the risk. Additionally, implement security controls to reduce the likelihood or impact of the risk, such as patching vulnerabilities, implementing strong authentication, encrypting sensitive data, and improving input validation.
- Transference: This involves shifting the responsibility or financial burden of the risk, such as purchasing third-party cyber insurance.
- Acceptance: When the risk is low impact or low probability and the cost of remediation outweighs the potential damage, it might be more beneficial to accept the potential risk and choose to focus your efforts elsewhere.
» Need help? Here's our complete guide to application security
5. Risk Monitoring and Review
Risk management is not a one-time activity. This ongoing stage involves continuously monitoring the identified risks, the effectiveness of implemented controls, and the emergence of new risks. Teams must continuously track vulnerabilities, detect threats, and verify security controls.
This includes automated scans (SAST/DAST/SCA), run-time protection (RASP/EDR), and regular audits (penetration tests/compliance checks). Maintaining a risk log and regularly reviewing security helps teams stay ahead of threats.
» Feeling stuck? Start with these considerations for building an application security program
Contextual, Regulatory, and Automation-Based Prioritization
A robust risk management strategy in software security requires a multi-faceted approach to prioritization. By incorporating contextual understanding, regulatory obligations, and the power of automation, organizations can focus their efforts on the specific risks that matter to their business:
1. Contextual Prioritization
Contextual prioritization involves evaluating security risks not just based on their technical severity (like CVSS scores) but also by considering the specific environment, business impact, and operational realities of the application and the organization.
Understanding the context of risks is essential as a high-severity vulnerability in an isolated, non-production system with no sensitive data might pose a lower actual risk than a medium-severity vulnerability in a public-facing application handling critical customer data.
By considering real-world exposure, teams avoid wasting time on low-risk issues and focus on the threats that really matter—runtime context helps teams focus on the most pressing and exploitable risks.
In general:
| Risk Context | How It Affects Triage |
|---|---|
| Actively exploited | Urgent remediation required |
| Internet-facing/production | High priority due to exposure |
| Behind authentication or internal | Lower risk but still monitored |
» See our guide to automating vulnerability triage
2. Regulatory Prioritization
Regulatory prioritization involves ranking security risks based on the legal and compliance obligations that apply to your organization and the specific application.
A low-severity vulnerability exposing protected health data may have greater consequences than a high-severity bug in an internal system. Fines, legal action, and reputational damage often outweigh technical impact.
Key regulations to consider include:
- HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act): This US law mandates strict security and privacy rules for protecting individuals' information.
- PCI DSS (Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard): This global standard requires organizations that handle credit card information to implement stringent security controls to prevent fraud.
- GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation): This EU regulation sets comprehensive rules for the collection, processing, and storage of personal data of individuals within the European Union, granting them significant rights.
- SOX (Sarbanes-Oxley Act): Primarily for publicly traded companies in the US, SOX includes requirements for data security and financial record-keeping to prevent fraud.
- CCPA/CPRA (California Consumer Privacy Act/California Privacy Rights Act): These US state laws grant California residents various rights over their personal information held by businesses.
3. Automation-Based Prioritization
Automation-based prioritization leverages application security tools and technologies to automatically collect, analyze, and rank security risks based on predefined criteria and real-time data.
As the number of applications and vulnerabilities grows, manual prioritization becomes inefficient and error-prone. Automation allows you to handle a larger volume of data effectively. Automated tools can quickly analyze vast amounts of information, identify high-risk vulnerabilities, and prioritize them for remediation much faster than manual processes.
Examples of automation in prioritization include:
- Vulnerability scanners: Automatically identify vulnerabilities and often provide a severity score.
- Threat intelligence platforms: Integrate information about active exploits and threat actors to elevate the priority of certain vulnerabilities.
- Security information and event management (SIEM) systems: Correlate security events and vulnerability data to identify high-risk incidents.
- Application security orchestration and correlation (ASOC) tools: Integrate findings from various security testing tools and apply contextual and business logic for prioritization.
- Risk management platforms: Automate the risk assessment and prioritization process based on defined rules and data inputs.
Automate Risk Management in AppSec With Jit
Understanding the principles, context, and practicalities of risk prioritization is foundational to effective software security, especially in a world of rapidly-evolving cyber threats. However, implementing these concepts efficiently and at scale often requires dedicated tools.
For organizations seeking a solution to streamline their AppSec risk management, including intelligent prioritization and actionable insights, look no further than Jit. Jit streamlines risk management by integrating contextual, policy-driven prioritization directly into CI/CD pipelines. Unlike traditional tools that inundate teams with raw vulnerability data, Jit correlates findings with real-world factors such as runtime exposure, compliance requirements, and business-critical assets.
» Ready to begin? Get started with Jit
