Jit vs Snyk
Achieve broader security scanning coverage at a lower cost with Jit, while empowering developers to secure their code without having to be security experts.
Adam
Engineering Team
Lead at Wonderschool
Lead at Wonderschool
“The integrations with our SaaS products, especially the deep GitHub PR integration are top notch and better than Snyk's, and super easy to setup and use.”
Scanner Coverage & Cost
Snyk
$8425/year
(Includes all Snyk products)
Jit
$3000/year
(Includes all Jit products)
Snyk
$16,850/year
(Includes Snyk Code, Open Source,
IaC, Container, and AppRisk)
IaC, Container, and AppRisk)
Jit
$6000/year
(Includes all Jit products)
Snyk
$42,125/year
(Includes Snyk Code, Open Source,
IaC, Container, and AppRisk)
IaC, Container, and AppRisk)
Jit
$15,000/year
(Includes all Jit products)
Snyk
$84,250/year
(Includes Snyk Code, Open Source,
IaC, Container, and AppRisk)
IaC, Container, and AppRisk)
Jit
$30,000/year
(Includes all Jit products)
Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Software Composition Analysis (SCA)
Software Composition Analysis (SCA)
Secrets Detection (Snyk recommends using third-party secrets detection tools - see docs)
Secrets Detection
IaC Security Scanning (no Pulumi support)
IaC Security Scanning
Container Security Scanning
Container Security Scanning
Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM)
Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM)
Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
for Web Apps and APIs
for Web Apps and APIs
Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
for Web Apps and APIs
for Web Apps and APIs
Kubernetes Manifest File Security Scanning
Kubernetes Manifest File Security Scanning
Serverless Manifest File Security Scanning
Serverless Manifest File Security Scanning
CI/CD Pipeline Security
CI/CD Pipeline Security
"We paid Snyk for their Code Security offering the same amount we're paying Jit for an entire SDLC security stack. Moving was a no brainer"
New Jit Customer
Platform Capabilities + Support Comparison
Jit
Snyk
AI Agents to automate time consuming AppSec tasks
AI Agents automatically perform application risk assessments, manage and follow up with tickets, run threat models, and much more.
Not supported
Developer UX: Detect and Resolve Issues in the PR
Scanning + auto remediation for all code scanners. Includes runtime context for detected issues
Only for SAST and SCA, no runtime context
"Snyk created a lot of friction with our developers, flooding them with vulnerabilities and slowing them down, which was the initial reason we were looking at Jit." - New Jit customer
"Snyk created a lot of friction with our developers, flooding them with vulnerabilities and slowing them down, which was the initial reason we were looking at Jit." - New Jit customer
Contextual Prioritization
Use runtime context to focus on the issues that introduce real risk
Supported, but costs extra
Fast onboarding across code repos, cloud resources, web apps and APIs
One-click activation across code scanners
"It took our team six months to deploy Snyk, and even then, we couldn't get it to full coverage." - New Jit customer
Maintain full coverage as you scale
Automatically scan new repos as they’re created
New repos must be manually added to Snyk as they’re added
Auto Remediation
For issues detected by SAST, SCA, IaC scanning and CSPM
For issues detected by SAST and SCA
Team-based Reporting
Jit Teams provides a dedicated security portal for each dev team by mapping service ownership to teams
Requires filtering for team-based views
Align security with business objectives
Security Plans group scanners to fulfill specific use cases
Basic compliance reporting
Code isn’t pulled to the cloud for analysis to minimize IP security risk
All scans run locally in the customer’s GitHub or GitLab environment
Snyk pulls code to their cloud for analysis
Responsible and affordable customer support
No cost 24/5 Customer Support, implementation guidance, developer training, a dedicated Slack channel & ad hoc guidance.
Tiered Customer Support and Professional Services that cost extra as support SLAs improve.
Static Application Security Testing (SAST) comparison
A reputable third-party security research firm (codsec.io) conducted a performance benchmark between Jit SAST (leveraging Semgrep OSS with Jit custom rules) and Snyk Code.
Here are the results:
Here are the results:
Language/
Metric
Metric
Typescript +Javascript
Python
Java
Scala
C#
Jit
Snyk
Jit
Snyk
Jit
Snyk
Jit
Snyk
Jit
Snyk
Total high-severity vulnerabilities
31
4
38
14
26
31
11
0
57
57
Exploitable (True positive)
28
4
29
13
26
23
11
0
53
35
Not exploitable (noise)
3
0
9
9
0
8
0
0
4
22
Accuracy
90%
100%
76%
93%
100%
74%
100%
0%
93%
61%
Scan time
0:08
0:15
1:18
0:16
0:07
12:25
0:33
0:36
0:04
0:17
Insights
Jit found significantly more true positives and had a better scan time
Jit ran longer but found almost 3 times more true positives
Jit reached a 100% accuracy with more true positives, less noise and much better scan time
The numbers speak for themselves
Jit's accuracy was significantly better with more true positives and better scan time
Simplify product security through automation and developer-friendly integrations
Fast and simple onboarding
across all repos
Developers never leave their
environment to resolve issues
High accuracy &
low noise
low noise
Consolidated monitoring &
reporting across all scanners