Top 10 Python Code Analysis Tools in 2025 to Improve Code Quality
Improving code quality is a fundamental necessity for sustainable and secure software development in Python—an almost-impossible task without the right code analysis tool.
Published May 21, 2025.
As software systems grow in complexity, so does the challenge of maintaining high code quality. In the dynamic world of Python development, writing functional code is just the first step. Ensuring that your code is also clean, maintainable, secure, and performant is paramount for long-term project success and developer sanity. This is where code analysis tools become indispensable.
This post dives into the top 10 Python code analysis tools of 2025 that every serious Python developer and team should consider leveraging to elevate their code quality.
» Using serverless applications in Python? Here's how to design secure tenant isolation in Python
Top 10 Python Code Analysis Tools at a Glance
- Best overall Python analysis tool: Jit
- Best Python analysis tool for adherence to code standards: Pylint
- Best Python analysis tool for SMBs: Flake8
- Best Python analysis tool for transitioning to type annotations: MyPy
- Best Python analysis tool for applications handling sensitive data: Bandit
- Best Python analysis tool for prioritizing code consistency: Black
- Best Python analysis tool for large-scale projects with type annotations: Pyright
- Best Python analysis tool for refactoring and cleanup: Vulture
- Best Python analysis tool for scanning custom, policy driven code: Semgrep
- Best Python analysis tool for enterprise-scale applications: SonarQube
Jit
Continuous security scanning throughout your SDLC
Integrates directly into Git workflows for immediate feedback
Pylint
Robust linter that guarantees coding standards
Deep understanding of code flow and type inference
Flake8
Straightforward linting solution for SMBs
Rich plugin ecosystem that focuses primarily on style and simple errors
Show more
Most Frequent Coding & Development Challenges in Python
- Dynamic typing and lack of type safety: Python’s dynamic typing increases flexibility but also raises the risk of runtime errors due to incorrect data types. This lack of type safety can lead to hard-to-detect bugs, especially in large codebases or during refactoring. Static analysis tools help catch type inconsistencies early, improving code reliability and making long-term maintenance more predictable.
- Inconsistent code style and formatting: Without strict enforcement, developers often introduce inconsistent naming conventions, indentation, and formatting. This leads to readability issues and slows down collaboration, especially in teams. Linters or formatters automate code style enforcement, enhancing readability and ensuring uniform code quality across the entire project.
- Unused or dead code: As projects evolve, unused functions, imports, or variables often accumulate. This dead code increases complexity, bloats the codebase, and makes debugging more difficult. Dynamic code analysis tools can detect and suggest removal of these unused elements, helping keep the code clean and maintainable.
- Security vulnerabilities: Python packages often include third-party dependencies, which may have known security flaws. Developers may also write insecure code, such as using eval() or hardcoding credentials.
- Poor error handling: Python’s exception-based error handling is powerful, but developers often catch generic exceptions or fail to handle edge cases, leading to hidden bugs. Static analysis can identify overly broad except blocks and unhandled exceptions, prompting more robust and specific error management strategies.
- Circular imports and complex dependencies: As Python projects grow, tangled import structures can introduce circular dependencies and brittle module relationships, leading to difficult debugging and performance overhead. Dependency analysis tools can help visualize and untangle these relationships, ensuring that the architecture remains modular and testable.
» Make sure you understand these core concepts of DevSecOps
Static vs. Dynamic Analysis in Python
Static analysis involves reviewing code for errors or vulnerabilities like syntax errors, dead code, and type inconsistencies without executing any programs. It's like reading a book to find errors before ever performing the actions described within it.
Dynamic analysis involves analyzing code while it is executing to find runtime errors, performance bottlenecks, security vulnerabilities, etc. It's like performing the book's actions to see what actually happens.
Teams must account for tightly coupled code, deep module dependencies, and potentially outdated legacy code. Tools may struggle with scale, so performance tuning, incremental scanning, and suppressing non-critical warnings become essential.
In contrast, modular microservices benefit from isolated, smaller codebases, allowing faster, more targeted scans. However, consistency across services is critical—teams should enforce shared linting rules, security policies, and CI integration.
» Confused? Learn more about SAST vs. DAST
Top 10 Python Code Analysis Tools in 2025 to Improve Code Quality
1
Jit
Continuous security scanning throughout your SDLC
Analysis methodology
Static and dynamic analysis through open-source integrations
Integration with development workflows
Excellent. Jit integrates directly into your toolsets, code commit flows, and deployments
Customization
Customizable SAST rulesets and tailored security coverage
Brief overview
Jit stands out as a modern DevSecOps platform that integrates seamlessly with CI/CD pipelines, automating security checks across code, dependencies, infrastructure as code (IaC), and configurations.
It centralizes and orchestrates tools like Bandit, Trivy, and Semgrep, making security analysis a default part of development without slowing teams down.
Jit's analysis methodologies
Jit performs static and dynamic analysis by integrating multiple open-source tools. It scans codebases for vulnerabilities, misconfigurations, and compliance issues, providing actionable insights.
Best practices for using Jit
Jit is particularly beneficial for teams aiming to embed security into their development lifecycle without disrupting workflows. It's ideal for organizations that require continuous security monitoring and compliance across diverse environments.
Other best practices include:
- Integrate Jit early in the development process to catch issues promptly.
- Customize security policies to align with organizational standards.
- Regularly update integrated tools to leverage the latest security
Pros and cons
Excellent integration potential
Integrates directly into Git workflows (pre-commit, PR checks) for immediate feedback
Can cover various security aspects beyond just static code analysis, including infrastructure as code or cloud configurations
Aims to surface the most critical issues to developers, reducing noise
Relies on the effectiveness of integrated tools
May offer less low-level customization compared to dedicated open-source tools
2
Pylint
Robust linter that guarantees coding standards
Analysis methodology
Static analysis without executing code
Integration with development workflows
Can be integrated into various stages of the development workflow, including IDE, CI/CD pipelines, and pre-commit hooks
Customization
Highly configurable, allowing users to tailor its behavior to match specific project requirements and coding standards
Brief overview
Pylint is a robust linter that checks for coding standards, possible errors, and code smells. It offers extensive configurability and detailed feedback, making it suitable for teams looking to enforce strict coding standards.
Pylint's analysis methodologies
Pylint performs static code analysis without executing the code. It checks for errors, enforces coding standards, and suggests improvements.
Developers gain from early detection of potential bugs and maintainable code structures.
Best practices for using Pylint
Pylint is best suited for projects where code quality and adherence to coding standards are paramount. It's beneficial for large codebases and teams that require consistent code reviews.
Other best practices include:
- Integrate Pylint into the CI/CD pipeline for continuous code quality checks
- Customize the configuration to match project-specific coding standards
- Regularly review and address Pylint warnings to maintain code
Pros and cons
Great configurability
Offers a very wide range of checks, including style, errors, complexity, and some security anti-patterns
Deep understanding of code flow and type inference
Strictness may cause overreporting that requires configuration adjustments
Can be relatively slow compared to other tools, especially on large codebases
Steeper learning curve
3
Flake8
Straightforward linting solution for SMBs
Analysis methodology
Scans Python scripts to flag potential errors
Integration with development workflows
Renowned for speed and simplicity, making it ideal for integration into various development workflows
Customization
Can be complex as it requires configuring its integrated tools and adding plugins
Brief overview
Flake8 combines pyflakes, pycodestyle, and McCabe to perform error checking, style guide enforcement, and cyclomatic complexity analysis. It's lightweight and highly extensible, making it a staple in many CI pipelines.
Flake8's analysis methodologies
Flake8 scans Python scripts to flag potential errors like indentation issues, unused imports, and naming violations. Developers benefit from consistent code formatting and early detection of simple coding errors.
Best practices for using Flake8
Flake8 is ideal for projects that prioritize code style consistency and simplicity. It's particularly useful for small to medium-sized teams seeking straightforward linting solutions.
Other best practices include:
- Use Flake8 in conjunction with pre-commit hooks to enforce code standards before commits
- Leverage Flake8 plugins to extend its capabilities as needed
- Regularly update Flake8 and its plugins to incorporate the latest checks
Pros and cons
Rich plugin ecosystem
Quick execution
Aggregates popular tools
Easy to configure
Focuses primarily on style and simple errors
Doesn't perform deep code analysis or detect complex bugs
While plugins exist, its core is not focused on security vulnerabilities
4
MyPy
Enhance reliability through type consistency
Analysis methodology
Analyzes code by checking type annotations against actual code usage
Integration with development workflows
Excellent integration with popular IDEs and text editors
Customization
Enforces strict rulesets but maintains high configurability through configuration files
Brief overview
MyPy is a static type checker that works with Python's optional type hints. It's essential in large codebases where dynamic typing can lead to subtle bugs and type enforcement improves maintainability and onboarding.
MyPy's analysis methodologies
MyPy analyzes code by checking type annotations against actual code usage, identifying mismatches and potential type-related errors. Developers gain from early detection of type errors, leading to more robust and maintainable code.
Best practices for using MyPy
MyPy is best suited for projects that have adopted or are transitioning to type annotations. It's particularly beneficial for large teams and codebases where type consistency enhances code reliability.
Other best practices include:
- Gradually introduce type annotations to existing codebases to ease the transition
- Use MyPy in continuous integration to enforce type checks consistently
- Combine MyPy with other linters for comprehensive code analysis
Pros and cons
Excellent at enforcing type correctness based on PEP 484 type hints
Allows gradual adoption of type checking with different strictness levels per module or globally
Encourages the use of type hints, making code easier to understand and maintain
Requires code to be annotated with type hints
May not catch all runtime errors
Learning curve for typing
Does not check for style, complexity, or dead code
5
Bandit
Python-first development security
Analysis methodology
Processes each file, builds an abstract syntax tree (AST), and runs appropriate plugins against the AST nodes
Integration with development workflows
Designed to fit into various stages of the development lifecycle to provide continuous security feedback
Customization
Allows customization of its scanning behavior by selecting/skipping tests, severity & confidence filtering, and excluding files & directories
Brief overview
Bandit is specialized in identifying security issues in Python code. It scans for vulnerabilities like insecure function use, hardcoded credentials, and injection risks, making it ideal for embedding security in the development process.
Bandit's analysis methodologies
Bandit processes each file, builds an abstract syntax tree (AST), and runs appropriate plugins against the AST nodes to detect security issues. Developers benefit from early identification of common security flaws, enhancing the application's security posture.
Best practices for using Bandit
Bandit is particularly useful for projects where security is a primary concern, such as applications handling sensitive data. It's beneficial for teams aiming to integrate security checks into their development workflow.
Other best practices include:
- Integrate Bandit into the CI/CD pipeline for continuous security checks
- Regularly update Bandit's configuration and plugins to detect the latest vulnerabilities
- Review and address Bandit's findings promptly to mitigate security risks
Pros and cons
Specifically designed to find common security vulnerabilities and anti-patterns
Optimized for Python code
Simple command-line interface to run security scans
Supports custom security tests
May not detect complex or context-specific security issues
May also produce false positives that require manual verification
Does not check for general bugs, style, or dead code
6
Black
Maintain code formatting with ease
Analysis methodology
Reformats code to adhere to its style guide
Integration with development workflows
Exceptionally well-suited for integration into various development workflows, automating the formatting process
Customization
Minimal—deliberately limits configuration options to ensure that all "blackened" code looks the same, regardless of the project or developer
Brief overview
Black is an opinionated code formatter that enforces consistent style. While it doesn't analyze logic or errors, Black ensures readability and prevents formatting debates by enforcing a single style automatically.
Black's analysis methodologies
Black reformats code to adhere to its style guide, ensuring consistent formatting across the codebase. Developers benefit from reduced code review time and improved code clarity.
Best practices for using Black
Black is ideal for teams that prioritize code consistency and want to eliminate formatting discussions. It's particularly useful in collaborative environments where uniform code style enhances readability.
Other best practices include:
- Integrate Black into the development workflow, such as pre-commit hooks, to enforce formatting automatically
- Adopt Black's formatting style across the team to maintain consistency
- Regularly run Black to format code, especially before code reviews
Pros and cons
Formats code in one consistent way
Requires almost no configuration
Great for teams
Fast and efficient for formatting
Opinionated formatting may not align with all preferences
Lack of configurability can be limiting for projects with specific style requirements
Does not detect bugs, security issues, or code smells
7
Pyright
Performant type checker developed by Microsoft
Analysis methodology
Performs static type checking by analyzing code and type annotations
Integration with development workflows
Designed for high performance and seamless integration, particularly as a language server, providing immediate feedback
Customization
Highly configurable through a JSON file, allowing granular control over its behavior
Brief overview
Pyright is a fast, performant type checker developed by Microsoft. It's particularly effective in large codebases, offering better performance than MyPy in many cases and supporting modern Python features.
Pyright's analysis methodologies
Pyright performs static type checking by analyzing code and type annotations, providing immediate feedback on type errors. Developers benefit from improved code reliability and faster development cycles due to early error detection.
Best practices for using Pyright
Pyright is best suited for large-scale Python projects that utilize type annotations. It's beneficial for teams requiring rapid type checking and integration with modern development tools.
Other best practices include:
- Use Pyright in conjunction with Visual Studio Code for seamless integration
- Regularly update type annotations to reflect code changes accurately
- Combine Pyright with other linters for comprehensive code analysis
Pros and cons
Known for its high performance, especially on large codebases
Excellent understanding of the Python type system
Offers various typeCheckingMode options and granular control over individual diagnostic rules
Solely focused on type checking
Integration is primarily optimized for Visual Studio Code
Effectiveness relies on the presence of type annotations
8
Vulture
Find and clean unused code
Analysis methodology
Performs static code analysis to detect unused code segments
Integration with development workflows
Focused on providing insights into code bloat and maintainability, primarily through command-line execution
Customization
Offers few options to fine-tune its analysis and reduce false positives, but does not have a plugin system or an API for defining custom dead code detection rules
Brief overview
Vulture identifies unused code (e.g., functions, variables, & imports) to help keep the codebase lean. It's great for refactoring legacy systems and removing technical debt.
Vulture's analysis methodologies
Vulture performs static code analysis to detect unused code segments. Developers benefit from a cleaner codebase, reduced complexity, and improved readability.
Best practices for using Vulture
Vulture is particularly useful for projects undergoing refactoring or cleanup. It's beneficial for teams aiming to reduce code bloat and improve maintainability.
Other best practices include:
- Run Vulture in conjunction with test suites to ensure accurate detection of unused code
- Review Vulture's findings carefully before removing code to avoid unintended consequences
Pros and cons
Excellent at its specific task of identifying unused code
Straightforward command-line interface
Helps differentiate between highly likely dead code and potential false positives
Does not cover bugs, security, style, or type checking
Can struggle with dynamically used code
Not designed for instant IDE feedback
9
Semgrep
Detect patterns in code semantics across languages
Analysis methodology
Parses code into an AST and applies user-defined or prebuilt rulesets to detect issues
Integration with development workflows
Built for seamless integration across the entire developer workflow, offering speed and flexibility
Customization
Highly flexible and readable rule system with custom rule creation and extensive granular control
Brief overview
Semgrep blends the power of regex and abstract syntax trees (AST) to scan code for security vulnerabilities, logic flaws, and bad practices. Unlike traditional linters, Semgrep uses customizable rules to detect patterns in code semantics across languages, making it incredibly flexible and precise.
Semgrep's analysis methodologies
Semgrep parses code into an AST and applies user-defined or prebuilt rulesets to detect issues. It works almost like grep, but for structured code patterns.
Developers benefit from deep visibility into code behavior, the ability to write custom rules, and integration into CI for fast, repeatable scans that catch critical vulnerabilities.
Best practices for using Semgrep
Semgrep shines in security-conscious development teams and DevSecOps environments that require custom, policy-driven code scanning. It's particularly valuable in fintech, healthcare, and regulated industries where security compliance and coding best practices must be enforced at scale.
Other best practices include:
- Use community or industry-specific rulesets to jump-start adoption
- Integrate Semgrep into the CI/CD process for fast feedback loops
- Write custom rules tailored to your application’s architecture and threat model to maximize relevance
- Regularly update rules to capture new threat patterns and best practices
Pros and cons
Highly flexible/customizable rules
Can scan code across many different programming languages
Designed for speed, including diff-aware scanning for CI/CD
Access to a large and growing collection of community and expert-maintained rules
May produce false positives or miss issues if rules are poorly scoped
Writing effective custom rules requires some understanding of ASTs and the underlying code structures
Doesn't handle code formatting or deep type inference
10
SonarQube
Continuous improvement at enterprise scale
Analysis methodology
Uses both static code analysis and heuristic algorithms to detect security issues
Integration with development workflows
Integrates deeply into the entire software development lifecycle, from IDEs to CI/CD, providing continuous feedback
Customization
Strong customization lies in its ability to aggregate and manage a vast number of rules, both built-in and custom, within its centralized platform
Brief overview
SonarQube offers comprehensive static analysis, measuring code quality across multiple dimensions: bugs, vulnerabilities, code smells, test coverage, and duplications. Its web-based dashboard provides trend reports and technical debt estimations, which sets it apart from purely CLI-based tools.
SonarQube's analysis methodologies
SonarQube uses both static code analysis and heuristic algorithms to detect security issues, bugs, and maintainability problems. It provides a centralized dashboard to visualize trends and supports pull request decoration in CI tools like Jenkins, GitHub Actions, and Azure DevOps. This leads to better team collaboration, reduced regressions, and improved long-term code health.
Best practices for using SonarQube
SonarQube is best suited for enterprise-scale applications and teams practicing continuous improvement. It’s particularly effective in organizations with multiple teams and long-lived codebases where quality governance and technical debt tracking are essential.
Other best practices include:
- Run SonarQube in a CI pipeline to catch issues before mergers
- Use quality gates to enforce standards across projects
- Monitor the evolution of technical debt over time to prioritize refactoring efforts
- Combine SonarQube with coverage tools for holistic insight
Pros and cons
Provides a unified dashboard for code quality and security across many languages
Enforces defined quality standards by failing builds if criteria are not met
Tracks code quality metrics over time, showing improvement or degradation
Setup and operation can be resource-intensive
Requires consistent usage and tuning
Community edition lacks some features like advanced security rules and branch analysis
3 Tips for Combining Python Analysis Tools to Reach Maximum Security
1. Assign Tools Clear Roles
Don’t throw every tool at every problem. Use linters like Flake8 for formatting and style, security scanners like Bandit or Jit for risk detection, and deeper analyzers like SonarQube for maintainability and code smells.
This way, each tool covers a specific angle, so you're not getting five alerts about the same typo.
2. Filter and Prioritize Results Early
Set up your tools to catch only what matters most—especially in CI/CD pipelines. Use severity filters, custom rule sets, or project-specific configurations to quiet the noise.
Alert fatigue usually comes from unfiltered verbosity, not tool count. Make sure what shows up in PRs is meaningful and fix-worthy.
» Learn more about CI/CD security
3. Use an Aggregator or Dashboard
When possible, plug all your tools into a single reporting system (like GitHub or Jit). Seeing everything in one place helps spot overlap, prioritize faster, and keeps devs from jumping between tools. Plus, it’s easier to track progress and trends that way.
Beyond the Bugs: Elevating Your Python Standards With Jit
Improving code quality isn't just a best practice—it's a fundamental necessity for sustainable and secure software development in Python. From Pylint's comprehensive checks to Black's uncompromising formatting, MyPy's rigorous type safety, and Bandit's vigilant security scans, each of these tools offers a unique lens through which to examine and enhance your codebase.
Trying to leverage the benefits of all these tools can be challenging, but it doesn't have to be. Jit acts as a security orchestration layer, unifying tools and their outputs while providing a consolidated view of security and quality issues directly within your development workflow. This holistic approach ensures that developers receive targeted, prioritized feedback without needing to navigate a fragmented landscape of individual tool reports.
» Ready to get started? Book a demo with Jit
